Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green zebra adventures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 23:18, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Green zebra adventures (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Creator removed speedy G11 nomination. Article has since been edited several times but still makes no claims to notability or even WP:GNG. Essentially promotional in tone and content. Fenix down (talk) 21:21, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - As per nom Codf1977 (talk) 21:28, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete - No indication of significance whatsoever -clearly falls under A7. Suggest an admin delete it now per WP:SNOWBALL. Thparkth (talk) 01:54, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete Promotional. No notability shown. Peridon (talk) 19:53, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. GregJackP Boomer!
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:26, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the nomination. —JonathanDP81 (Talk | contribs) 17:34, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, thinly-veiled advertisement for a non-notable tour company.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 19:12, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.