Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GreySpark Partners
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:40, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- GreySpark Partners (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article was nominated for speedy deletion, and nomination was removed by SPA AnonIP editor. I have searched for any reliable source coverage to establish notability and have been unsuccessful. This appears to be a case of WP:TOOSOON. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:25, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:Notability; All references are the company's own website and press releases. Iglooflame (talk) 18:10, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence of notability in the article (refs to company's own site, Linkedin, and a PR release about a previous company); there are a couple of slightly better refs available: on their formation, on their opening another office but these are routine financial news items falling short of WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 19:04, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Spam and I have tagged for G11. Safiel (talk) 03:39, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.