- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Either a casual hoax, or an odd attempt at OR - as indicated by the reference. –SJ+ 18:40, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Grind turn pull (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
this article is unsalvageably non-notable Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 13:08, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Given that there are exactly two hits on google for the exact phrase "Grind turn pull" which are this article and the entry on the AFD page... It doesn't technically meet any of the deletion criteria since it's not an individual, animal, organization, web content, or song. SDY (talk) 13:19, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Can't agree with speedying the article only because there is no {{db-original research}} tag. LordVetinari (talk) 13:34, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- You could very easily add one. The reference is, for all I can tell, a joke. SDY (talk) 13:38, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, I agree with that. I was just trying to highlight my view of the article as being WP:OR and also propose a new speedy criterion in a simultaneous and economical manner. LordVetinari (talk) 15:17, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That said, I've added a {{db-hoax}} tag. If that flies, then this discussion can be admin closed. Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 14:13, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not sure it qualifies as an obvious hoax, though: obvious hoaxes involve physical or historical impossibilities. It is definitely a dictionary definition, original research, and simply dumb. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:58, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.