Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grossberg's Algorithm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singu larity 03:12, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grossberg's Algorithm

Something made up one day, albeit not in school. OR, as evidenced by use of first person. SamBC(talk) 21:55, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete until it's published, not before. - Richfife 22:01, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Possibly the Google:Cohen-Grossberg theorum. •Malinaccier• ^T/C 22:17, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Cohen-Grossberg was first published in 1983. The content of this article clearly originates much later than that. - Richfife 22:22, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete Obvious original research. No evidence at all that this has been researched, peer-reviewed or published in any way Apparently not related to Cohen-Grossberg which apparently has to do with the modeling of neuron networks, not static networks. Also note that the author created Grossberg Circuit and Grossberg Theorem, both related to this article and both also being considered by AfD. - CosmicPenguin (Talk) 23:10, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As obvious a case of violating WP:OR as could be found. Tendancer 00:01, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete per nom. -- Irixman ^{(t) (m)} 00:03, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unsourced, unencyclopedic style and obviously OR. Gandalf61 10:16, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.