Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ground Air Emergency Code

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 07:01, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ground Air Emergency Code

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Ground Air Emergency Code (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly esoteric, lacking SIGCOV (which BEFORE confirms) and therefore failing WP:GNG, this is a possible redirect/merge to Distress signal but there's no evidence it warrants a standalone article. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:57, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:57, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.