Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Group Intervention Panel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Youth Inclusion Support Panel. Cirt (talk) 22:06, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Group Intervention Panel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. hardly anything in gnews. LibStar (talk) 01:36, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find significant coverage of this organization. Jujutacular ^T · C 19:46, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is actually a ground breaking project and worthy of being on here, the UK's YIp's projects are based upon it. As for significant coverage think we can't banish most of wikipedia to the bin.--Pandaplodder (talk) 00:04, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:00, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Youth Inclusion Support Panel. The Group Intervention Panel article itself states that the term is just local branding for the national scheme. --FormerIP (talk) 17:06, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Youth Inclusion Support Panel as the best alternative to deletion. Using the Google News Archive link provided by LibStar (talk · contribs), I found mostly passing mentions about the topic. Not enough to establish notability. A redirect to Youth Inclusion Support Panel would be useful to preserve the page history in the event that this local chapter becomes notable. Cunard (talk) 06:26, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.