Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Group booking

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Suitable target for merge & redirect not found. No prejudice against a redirect getting made if a target is found. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Group booking

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 20:12, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. J947 Public (talk) 23:01, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. J947 Public (talk) 23:01, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as per nom, Wikipedia is neither a dictionary nor a repository of unsourced articles, nor a collection of the blindingly obvious(mostly). Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:07, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Surely there must be some article to which we can merge and redirect this. As it stands, we don't even have an article on the general concept of regular "booking" in this sense. bd2412 T 03:24, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any likely articles to redirect to?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 00:20, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since I can't find a suitable redirect target, rename Reservation (booking) and rejigger the text of this article. The list of things that can be reserved can go in the first paragraph after an intro is cobbled together, then group bookings can constitute the second. I suppose I could do that (unless there is another ~~sucker~~ volunteer?). Clarityfiend (talk) 02:31, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, !dave 09:17, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I feel this is a nessersary article for informing people about theatre.theatrelover2467 (talk) 18:07, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Sock vote struck. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No sources = WP:V fail = mandatory deletion. No objection to a sourced recreation as an article instead of a dicdef. Sandstein 10:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.