Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grouptrader Networks Limited

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:55, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Grouptrader Networks Limited

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not a notable company and the article was previously speedily deleted under the name Grouptrader. The article has no reliable sources (just PRs and primary sources). I have searched for sources, and found only: local press, and trade press that sounds like an advertorial. Fences&Windows 20:03, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: My searches also turned up nothing but that Brentwood Gazette/Essex Chronicle piece. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 20:42, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. sst✈^(discuss) 11:51, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. sst✈^(discuss) 11:51, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. sst✈^(discuss) 11:51, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Clearly not yet notable as this company only started in 2012 and the sourcing is hardly convincing enough and lastly my searches only found a few passing mentions particularly at News and browsers. SwisterTwister talk 00:07, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This company does not appear to be notable. I was unable to find any significant coverage being provided by reliable sources. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:16, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. No significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Edwardx (talk) 21:01, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.