- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jayjg (talk) 01:35, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Grsync (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Possibly non-notable software. Cleanup tag asking for sources has been posted since August 2009, though so far there don't seem to be any independent third-party sources in the article. Psychonaut (talk) 23:53, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 01:03, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or merge to rsync: seems to be one of the few GUIs for rsync, therefore, making it notable in this aspect --SF007 (talk) 02:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep (1st choice) or merge to rsync. Off the top of my head I would have said merge because it's a simple GUI for that app, but there's an article just about it [1] in linux.com and also here an online re-publication of a de:PC Welt article (look at the copyright tag at the end), and given as "hot pick" in Linux Format [2]. Books only mention it though, no detailed description, e.g. [3]. This is obviously not a delete issue though. Pcap ping 07:12, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep (do not merge). This has several strong and independent references. Moreover, this is not a good merge candidate, since the article is too long to comfortably fit in the rsync parent. LotLE×talk 07:38, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep; references have since been provided establishing notability. —Psychonaut (talk) 20:42, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.