- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to D (programming language). Black Kite (t) (c) 17:07, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- GtkD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Very specialised bit of software with no evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:32, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:32, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Hard to imagine a language binding being notable. MadCow257 (talk) 18:40, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that there are other articles on language bindings, such as RGtk2. Cogiati (talk) 04:05, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps we could merge GtkD into the D programming language article? Cogiati (talk) 04:08, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, causa sui (talk) 00:12, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to D (programming language): If this had just been a section of that article, no-one would seriously recommend a split.. --Slashme (talk) 06:49, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.