- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 20:46, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Guce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable rapper from non-notable group (whose article was deleted). Fails WP:MUSIC. Prod removed without comment. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 13:05, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 13:08, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment – Here is one article from the East Bay Express. That's not enough, but perhaps there is more... Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 14:20, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom NN Dreamspy (talk) 21:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm rather surprised that an artist with that many albums released can have so few google hits when I search for some of those albums. Since I was not able to find multiple non-trivial mention, it's a delete vote from me. --Bardin (talk) 14:43, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.