Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guild of Defiants
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete nancy (talk) 13:13, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Guild of Defiants (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:MUSIC and N. One claim of notability that is not sourced, as there are no sources. Delete Undeath (talk) 04:28, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The claim to notability is now cited correctly, making them notable. Atyndall93 | talk
- Delete. One article does not establish notability, and a quick Google search doesn't encourage me as to how notable they are. They have fewer hits than I do, and other than the BBC article, I don't see anything really reputable to establish them as noteable. The coverage of them seems trivial and too short-lived to warrant an article. Titanium Dragon (talk) 06:50, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 (T / C) 07:01, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 08:49, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable band. All the bluelinks in the article go to unrelated people and topics. KleenupKrew (talk) 11:52, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.