Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guitar Unleashed
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:48, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Guitar Unleashed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Spam-looking, blatant advertisement-looking article with no reliable sources about non-notable software. "Features" are copyvio from http://www.hifiunleashed.com/guitarunleashed.php GreyCat (talk) 12:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- Unclear what the hell this product is, or why it's notable. WP:CSD#G11 might be appropriate for this article. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 12:14, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 12:14, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Spammy, unreleased product with no clear Google hits outside its own webpage. Mangoe (talk) 13:58, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete G11 Blatant advertisment, never asserts notability. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 15:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with speed (G11) — may not be a copyvio, but it certainly is blatant advertisement and hence is eligible for a Spammy award. MuZemike (talk) 17:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note This page will be expanded to give tutorial data as we near release. The site and products are new yes, but we are also trying to build a community. Cadaha 19:29 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Based on this statement I'm going along with a speedy delete. We aren't here to build community for a new product. Mangoe (talk) 23:47, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed Looks like a case of promotion. I've put a welcome on the creator's talk page which will hopefully help out when/if this product becomes notable in the future. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 01:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, the word "we" in that post was a tip off to some major COI. So, yeah. Blatant advertising. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 15:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed Looks like a case of promotion. I've put a welcome on the creator's talk page which will hopefully help out when/if this product becomes notable in the future. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 01:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Based on this statement I'm going along with a speedy delete. We aren't here to build community for a new product. Mangoe (talk) 23:47, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete clear G11. JuJube (talk) 07:10, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.