Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was All redirected to Gulaal. This stub was obviously talking about the same movie. Non-admin closing. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 12:25, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gulal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Gulaal (2009 movie) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-Notable Bollywood film. This is a stub, orphan, and I'm not sure if it's a hoax or not. Cssiitcic (talk) 20:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: I had moved this article to Gulaal (2009 movie) before this nomination could be completed. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 21:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Sources could be improved upon, but it's clearly not a hoax. Several notable publications discuss the film as can be seen from the summaries in this google search - Mgm|^(talk) 09:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Salih (talk) 13:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - No its not a hoax. Just Google it, there are several sources IBN live[1]TOI. —SV 13:28, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Gulaal but Delete Gulal.Cssiitcic (talk) 17:38, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes. Delete the redirect. It is the author's misguided way of working around the fact there was already a Gulaal article, this one for a 2001 movie from the same country. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 22:16, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Loads of sources found by Google News[2][3], including several lengthy articles in The Times of India and The Hindu, two of the world's four highest circulation English language non-tabloid newspapers. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:44, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.