Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guys with feelings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - PeaceNT (talk) 18:13, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guys with feelings

procedural nomination—version brought to AFD: This went through a PROD-dePROD cycle in July 2007 (see diff between PROD-nominated versions) with very little difference in content between the previous and current versions. The latest PROD nominator stated "Does not meet WP:WEB notability requirements: has not been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works (ref given is a show time listing), won a well-known and independent award, or distributed via a medium which is both respected and independent of the creators. Article has been tagged requiring references since November 2007." User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 19:57, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Three editors who substantially contributed to the article have been individually informed of this ongoing discussion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 20:00, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Podcasting has been informed of this ongoing discussion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 20:04, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Apologies, when Prodding I did't go back and check the history. Main concerns are the article does not meet WP:WEB notability guidelines and does not provide WP:RS reliable sources. The only reference given is a blog entry detailing show times, so a trivial mention. --Breno ^talk 02:00, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no reliable sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 22:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:WEB and WP:RS. ---CWY2190^T^C 01:16, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jayron32|talk|contribs 05:11, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Three deletes isn't enough? Here's a fourth. Powers ^T 14:42, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and a fifth, per WP:WEB and a lack of reliable sources Doc Strange (talk) 17:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.