Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Habitable planet
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was REDIRECT to Planetary habitability. Robert 16:53, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This is a laundry list of dubious noun conjuncts ("Inhabited Terraformable Marginally Inhabitable Planet"). Hard to follow and if not OR essentially an off-the-top-of-the-head ramble. The much more comprehensive Planetary habitability has recently been created. I'd merge if I saw anything worth it and instead think it should be deleted. Marskell 15:17, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll officially go redirect ahead of delete. The history will allow for merge material if anyone finds it useful. Marskell 10:13, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Poorly written, but not nonsense. I would vote to keep and cleanup, but Planetary habitability is a much better article on the same general subject. Redirect to Planetary habitability, and possibly merge the contnet about Planets for man. DES (talk) 15:49, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delet/redirect Vsmith 16:03, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to the superior article at Planetary habitability.--Isotope23 19:20, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, given that I'm involved I won't do it, but could the next editor stopping by do a speedy redirect? The history will still provide potential merge material. Marskell 22:52, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with "Planetary habitability" --MacRusgail 15:47, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.