Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hackingthemainframe
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 19:35, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable forum, not in Alexa top 100,000. [1] Jasmol 02:20, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- Obvious delete. I only bothered voting because someone has to. Reyk 23:10, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Less than 1500 registered users, only two of them active in the past 15 minutes. Only three active topics in the most active forum: "general chat". Looks pretty dead to me. --Carnildo 23:15, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Is "how active a website" is the only criteria for deletion? Is traffic the deciding factor?
In the town of Prince Rupert, BC, this is _the_ local website. It is significant to this town. I vote keep it, if "significance" is important. If you realize it's a town of 10k people, then 1500 registered users is a lot.
- Then put an external link in Prince Rupert, British Columbia. Forums and website only deserve their own article when they have an audience of a significant size. - Mgm|(talk) 09:18, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with "Communications" in Prince Rupert, British Columbia -- getcrunk juice 22:54, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. I'd also suggest the article author do as Mgm suggested. --—Locke Cole (talk) (e-mail) 09:08, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.