- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 17:14, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Haemotaphonomy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This appears to be a non-notable fringe science or neologism. Google search results and the article indicate that this "science" only appears in the works of its inventor, one Mr. Policarp Hortolà, who also appears to have written this article as Policarp (talk · contribs). Sandstein 22:35, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:33, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as the only search results I could find indeed refer to the work of said Mr. Policarp Hortolà. No third party references found. -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 06:13, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, interesting article, but not a term or a concept that's been picked up by anyone but its inventor. Fails WP:N due to lack of independent sources. Lankiveil (speak to me) 23:40, 11 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.