Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haneef Shareef

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 15:43, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Haneef Shareef

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than an imdb link (which means nothing towards notability), this article is devoid of any sources to establish how this individual meets WP:BIO notability criteria. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:32, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SMS ^Talk 18:04, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SMS ^Talk 18:04, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. SMS ^Talk 18:04, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Please also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Haneef Shareef (t) Josve05a (c) 18:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete: The article did include sources at one point of time, which the user wich included them removed again, but however the perosn doesn't appear to be notable enough for a Wikipedia-entry. (t) Josve05a (c) 20:50, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He is not notable enough. Sajjad Altaf (talk) 21:29, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment While I agree that the current article is a mess, shouldn't we give Yunshui a little more than five hours to improve it before nominating it again? Huon (talk) 21:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, i did not see that but since i saw it on nominations and evaluated the page and the subject and already came to an opinion so won't change my vote, Thanks Sajjad Altaf (talk) 21:36, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I already tried improving it, but the article's creator persistently reverted the sourced material I added. I've got better things to do with my time. It's borderline anyway; I'd say Weak delete based on WP:BLP1E - he's only notable for his 2005 arrest and detention, not for any of his films or writings. Yunshui 雲‍水 22:24, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per Yunshui -- Alexf^(talk) 11:48, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The article now includes footnotes but one is from Wordpress, one from IMDb and one in just a scanned copy of a novel written by the person. Those do not count as reliable sources. (t) Josve05a (c) 12:01, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lacks significant coverage. Sam Sailor ^Sing 18:14, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.