Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanunoo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. –MuZemike 06:09, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hanunoo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Both entries link to the same page. Redundant. Perhaps a direct from Hanuno'o language to Hanuno'o.?--Coin945 (talk) 11:47, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

keep or redirect if there is a primary target - they do not link to the same article - but WP:TWODABS: If there are only two topics to which a given title might refer, and one is the primary topic, then a disambiguation page is not needed—it is sufficient to use a hatnote on the primary topic article, pointing to the other article. Christian75 (talk) 20:26, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, my mistake...--Coin945 (talk) 22:13, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and move dab to Hanunó'o. There doesn't appear to be a primary topic so having a dab seems valid. But since both articles use the spelling "Hanunó'o" the dab should be at this title, with Hanunóo and Hanunoo as redirects. France3470 (talk) 00:12, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Close this AfD. Hanunoo is fine as it is. I made a mistake in thinking the two entries reidrected to the same thing.--Coin945 (talk) 00:25, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.