- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Luigi30 (Ταλκ το mε) 14:06, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is this real? It doesn't show up on google much for something that's supposedly an internet term... I recommend either transwiki whatever's verifiable to wiktionary or delete. Grandmasterka 19:18, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete I removed the transwiki tag from the article, and I'm voting speedy deletion, because this entire article is a complete hoax. The user who created the article "Hapirott" is named Hapirott (and has no other WP edits- see Special:Contributions/HapiROTT), and the first Google links are to gaming and computer sites where somebody (hmm, the same person?) has the user name Hapirott. This is complete nonsense- it's just somebody's vanity article. Kill this, and kill it now. And, while we're at it, protect it from recreation. -- Kicking222 20:12, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per CSD:G1 (Patent nonsense). Tagged. -- ReyBrujo 21:37, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]- It's not patent nonsense unless it's gibberish (i.e. a;ksjv:ZXOcuoH s*(**(*(*(). Please don't tag it as such. Snoutwood (talk) 21:44, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Seems you are right, thanks for the correction. Changing my vote to Delete then. -- ReyBrujo 22:06, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not patent nonsense unless it's gibberish (i.e. a;ksjv:ZXOcuoH s*(**(*(*(). Please don't tag it as such. Snoutwood (talk) 21:44, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.