- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Bduke (talk) 08:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Happy thoughts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Delete Fails WP:RS and WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete seems like a personal essay or school assignment. No sources. BusterD (talk) 01:16, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to positive thinking. Looks like OR and fails WP:V. Hard to believe this has been around since 2004...--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 14:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Wait, that's a redirect in itself. Redirect to Attitude (psychology) then or just delete.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 14:19, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Madness. The article itself says this is specifically within the realm of fantasy, which I take to mean fantasy related fiction or movies. Within that genre, the term becomes a term-of-art. - Philippe | Talk 22:30, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Verges on non-sense. This is a non-notable, unencyclopedia subject, not to mention it looks like original research, and is utterly unverifiable. Dgf32 (talk) 23:36, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:OR. — ERcheck (talk) 05:05, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.