- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was consensus to delete. Johnleemk | Talk 02:46, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This article is original research and irredeemably POV. --דוד ♣ D Monack 07:00, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Squiddy 08:25, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator, also concepts within a single university aren't notable. — JIP | Talk 08:37, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom (also, looks like an attack page). Mark K. Bilbo 14:54, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator but also due to being an attack page. Smk 16:15, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep with tags that are already in article for cleanup etc. Is not original research, as google gives me 22 hits explaining it, so original nomination not accurate. Sounds like a legitimate concept. See what happens with the tags, then renom later if needed. Zordrac 20:15, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Sophomoric sarcasm about an inherently non-notable concept. Hey, my friends and I used to bitch about our university too. rodii 21:09, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- Dalbury(Talk) 23:27, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The author might even be an angry student at the schoolRjensen 15:10, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.