- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:48, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Harmonica man (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Book with no assertion of notability. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 02:11, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: An obvious hoax. Schuym1 (talk) 03:08, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I cannot say whether or not this is a hoax, but it is certainly a nonnotable book by a nonnotable author. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 03:19, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unnotable, and, by its very nature, totally unverifiable. TallNapoleon (talk) 05:17, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Certainly not notable. It's suspect that the user is also trying to promote this with entires in the Beat Generation article. -- Doom (talk) 21:09, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:09, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.