Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harris Department Store
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Erik9 (talk) 01:03, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Harris Department Store (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
`Unreferenced for nearly three years, fails verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 16:07, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- keep There do seem to be plenty of sources however bad the article might be [1]. Hobit (talk) 01:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:21, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand per Hobit's sources. Plenty of non-trivial coverage, and probably even more centering around its merger with Gottschalks, another notable chain. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 14:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- P.S., why is it that all the retail articles on Wikipedia suck? Quit slacking off, people. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 14:12, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- not just retail; business articles in general. Our weakest area. DGG (talk) 03:09, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Besides country music (hint hint). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 22:10, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.