Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harsh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete (just). It's borderline, but I don't see any point in relisting this one. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 15:18, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Harsh

This page doesn't seem to follow WWIN-Dictionary. Send it over to Wiktionary is they've not got an entry on it...which I'm sure they do. Also it's more of a name etymology article than it is a definition, which makes it somewhat worse, in my opinion. JHMM13 (T | C) 23:42, 5 December 2005 (UTC) This is not an important entry into wikepedia please consider deletion from damon[reply]

I remember seeing this and trying to decide if I wanted to AFD it, but I don't. It's a weak delete from me. Stifle 12:50, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NN --rogerd 05:26, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

(Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harsh (2nd nomination) for new AFD)