Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hart Merriam Schultz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Mkomkobhuvgy (talk) 01:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC) "Closing AfD, result was keep (nomination withdrawn)."[reply]

Hart Merriam Schultz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no importance Mkomkobhuvgy (talk) 00:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 February 8. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Super keep it reaches notability guidelines..speedy keep(James128769 (talk) 00:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]
Speedy keep. This is a bad-faith nomination, possibly just a test, by a new user account with no history prior to creating this AFD discussion. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I AM Favonian,HAVE YOU ABILITY TO IDENTIFY? WHY DID YOU KEEP THIS ARTICLE FOR DELETION?

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.