Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haven Back Packer Resort
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. (X! · talk) · @163 · 02:54, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Haven Back Packer Resort (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
coatrack for news event. All independent sources are about the news event, not the "resort". Duffbeerforme (talk) 14:30, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\talk 14:32, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for the exactly the same reasons I stated when PRODing it 16 months ago: "This article is not about the hostel but is a WP:COATRACK used to discuss an instance of alleged racism. As such the article verges on a WP:ATTACK page." That it has stayed on Wiki so long reflects terribly on us. -- Mattinbgn\talk 14:35, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Definitely coatrack. The incident itself is certainly notable but not encyclopedic. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:32, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per Mattinbgn. Joe Chill (talk) 19:15, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, coatrack, the sooner it's deleted the better. Lankiveil (speak to me) 22:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.