Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hazard Vulnerability Analysis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:39, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hazard Vulnerability Analysis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unestablished notability as a distinct topic. May be too jargon-y. Jprg1966 ^(talk) 18:43, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as per nomination. Perhaps merging is worthwhile, but it's needless as an individual article. --Qwerty Binary (talk) 21:18, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not appear to be appropriate for a standalone article due to lack of sourcing. Could be merged/redirected to Emergency management. --MelanieN (talk) 05:03, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 07:46, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 01:20, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.