Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hearing and Service Dogs of Minnesota

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 03:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hearing and Service Dogs of Minnesota (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Contested prod, but no real reason for contesting given. No claims to notability, despite being tagged for notability for over a year. A private organisation, with no third party references, no referenced news coverage of note. Canterbury Tail talk 03:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per this Google News Archive search. This article (from the Star Tribune), this article (from Coon Rapids Herald), this article (from Read the Bridge), as well as plenty more, are enough to establish notability per WP:ORG. Cunard (talk) 04:14, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per independent coverage found by Cunard.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 06:28, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I'm also a little regionally biased since I see their dogs being trained here in downtown Minneapolis. --Bobak (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.