Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heartbeat theory
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:56, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Heartbeat theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Proposed deletion as original research, seconded, tag removed with no explanation by single purpose account (sockpuppet?). Still open and unequivocal case of original research. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 23:42, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nonsense. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 23:47, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect no longer nonsense, but is it notable? Is it known by this name? Redirect to Basal metabolic rate#Longevity. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 00:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I've completely rewritten the article! Please evaluate its worthiness to be kept based on how it looks now. Thanks! (EhJJ)TALK
- Withdraw Article no longer original research. Just keep an eye out in case original author tries to revert. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 23:59, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.