- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Punkmorten 23:55, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable mucisian, sounds like a bit of a con artist!--Edchilvers 22:21, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I've tried to find more information about him, but so far, have been unable. It is quite likely that his "borrowing" of another artist's music may be the most notable thing he ever does. His music on his new album is pretty, but it doesn't sound very special to me. I agree with deletion on the grounds that he, for himself is not truly notable yet.VBlack 06:56, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non notable, fails WP:MUSIC. Nuttah68 21:00, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, --- RockMFR 05:48, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Clearly nn. Chairman S. Talk Contribs 06:15, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails at being a notable plagiarist. --Dhartung | Talk 07:24, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Plagiarism happens all the time; nothing else suggests substantial notability. Heimstern Läufer 07:50, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nn, fails WP:MUSIC -Advanced 18:02, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.