Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen Boaden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —Theopolisme 23:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Helen Boaden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is the subject sufficiently of note (notable) independently in her own right, or is redirection to another article a better way? -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 14. Snotbot  t • c »  02:31, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per WP:GNG; certainly is notable. Just take a look on Google, there's The Guardian, The Huffington Post, The Daily Telegraph, everything. Premature nomination, so perhaps even a "speedy keep". Article may not be the best, but person is still, again, notable, see WP:NOTABLE. TBrandley 05:21, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The way that the article was previously written suggests something slightly different, with a fair dose of possible self- and insider-editing. Well, back in England, there was virtually none outside of the BBC who had actually heard of her, before this Jimmy Savile scandal. I remain undecided, neither keep, damn, nor re-direct. -- KC9TV 06:30, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Director of News at the BBC is a notable position. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:21, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep -- Senior managers in BBC are certainly notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:47, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.