Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hello Heartbreak
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 08:11, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello Heartbreak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:NM. I've made several attempts to simply redirect the song to the appropriate album, but many users always break that redirect and add text that doesn't assert the song's notability. DiverseMentality(Discuss it) 19:02, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - "The Greatest" is the next main single, not this... this is less notable than that, and it doesn't even have an article CloversMallRat (talk) 06:51, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - "The Greatest" may be the next main single, but it hasn't even charted on any charts, unlike "Hello Heartbreak" which has and I don't think the record company would release the song as a single via iTunes if the song wasn't going to be released.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mus001 (talk • contribs)
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:24, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I feel that this page is very important and shout be kept. It has been confirmed as her 2nd single as long as the greatest. The single is having more air play and has already charted on the billboard charts! The track has been released and Michelle has confirmed on her official myspace that she will be shooting the video early october and would like some idea's. This is major important and if it does be deleted it will only be have to be made again in the next few weeks. Please keep it, It took me a very long time and alot of people want to know this information! Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.163.87 (talk) 19:46, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Charted only on Sales charts which are generally not enough. No sources, no hope of expansion. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:10, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It passes WP:NM per "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts"', in which it has charted highly on Hot Dance Singles Sales. So I vote Keep. -24.92.46.22 (talk) 04:27, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, lifebaka++ 15:49, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply] - Comment re that Single Sales chart "Often, songs that become number one on this chart, do not even chart on the Hot 100." per the Wp article. So I'm having difficulty thinking that's good enough for notability. The music charts are so fragmented by genre and distribution that it's hard to give credence to the smaller charts. MadScot (talk) 16:53, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:16, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.