Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helma Object Publisher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 09:04, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Helma Object Publisher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article fails notability guidlines and has reliable source issues. Also written like an ad Pmedema (talk) 18:11, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as nom. --Pmedema (talk) 18:12, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as having only one third party source which hardly gives extensive coverage (it's mostly about Linux). GDallimore (Talk) 20:11, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 20:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I can't find any source to support notability. VG ☎ 10:47, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination, non-notable piece of non-consumer software. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:08, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.