- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh 20:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Helping Helps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Very little material, and provides no explanation of notability. Original author has had two weeks to expand the article. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 07:49, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - can find no significant coverage from independent reliable sources, or any other reasons would demonstrate notability. As far as I know there is still a failure of consensus for the notability of individual episodes, but there is nothing here to demonstrate notability in my opinion.--BelovedFreak 11:32, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no reliable coverage about this episode. -- Whpq (talk) 12:59, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:22, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.