- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 13:19, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Helping is Easy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This charity does not appear to meet the notability guideline at WP:NONPROFIT. There does not appear to be significant coverage of the charity in reliable secondary sources. VQuakr (talk) 07:49, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Article fails Criterion 2 of WP:NONPROFIT. --Djc wi (talk) 08:29, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:46, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm sure this charity does good work, but it does not meet the criteria for notability. References are self-referential. Nothing found at Google News Archive. --MelanieN (talk) 03:59, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.