Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hem Chander Vikramaditya
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirected by the nominator, which is effectively the same as "nomination withdrawn" with no other delete !votes. Closing the AfD accordingly.—S Marshall Talk/Cont 11:47, 22 October 2009 (UTC) [reply]
- Hem Chander Vikramaditya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article already exists by another name Samrat Hem Chandra Vikramaditya with more information and citations. TheBigA (talk) 09:19, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Then what's it doing at AfD? Per WP:BEFORE, should've redirected it instead of nominating for deletion.—S Marshall Talk/Cont 10:44, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per S Marshall. Thryduulf (talk) 13:48, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 13:48, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirected to Samrat Hem Chandra Vikramaditya, please close AFD. --Redtigerxyz Talk 14:24, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, you didn't; that wasn't the correct syntax for a redirect. I've undone your revision for the moment, and I shall not close the AfD quite yet. Such a closure would be subject to overturning at deletion review. It's only fair that the nominator has a chance to answer us; there may be some factor of which we are not aware.—S Marshall Talk/Cont 16:18, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per S Marshall above. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:42, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirected to the correct article. --TheBigA (talk) 09:15, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.