- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --MuZemike 04:09, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- HemiHelp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Blatantly promotional product of Bell Pottinger. Kilopi (talk) 22:09, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It doesn't seem like blatent promotion to me, and there are third party sources available on the net (several are already cited, albeit improperly) This artive may need a bit of work to conform to WP:NOPV, but I don't think it should be deleted. Millermk90 (talk) 07:50, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep. Not particularly notable charitable, but I tend to be charitable towards charities. --Legis (talk - contribs) 07:24, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Sure, it's promotional, but that could be edited out. However, I find significant coverage lacking. There is a brief mention in this article and a half mention in this BBC article, but that's it. Drmies (talk) 04:17, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No doubt it is a worthy cause. But aside from the odd celebrity endorsement, this charity gets little or no coverage from Reliable Sources. --MelanieN (talk) 03:27, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 03:33, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete but redirect to Bell Pottinger Tarheel95 (Sprechen) 13:52, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.