- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tim Song (talk) 16:35, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Herb Ruby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Played minor league baseball for one season, following a mediocre college baseball career. He enlisted in the military, and it is sourced, but that doesn't make him notable. The only things that might make him notable is coaching a high school basketball team to a state title and a local paper giving an award in his name, but I'd still vote delete. What do you vote? Muboshgu (talk) 17:24, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. —Muboshgu (talk) 17:14, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Are minor league players not notable? Brian Knight Bishop (talk) 17:53, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete They have to prove notability under the regular system of extensive coverage in independent and reliable sources. Major League Baseball players are inherently notable under WP:ATHLETE. "Minor league players, managers, coaches, executives, and umpires are not assumed to be inherently notable." (quoting from WP:NSPORT#Baseball which sums up the general interpretation by Wikipedia's baseball fans on how to apply inherent notability). Mandsford (talk) 18:19, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Question he's not notable for minor leage baseball for sure... but he did complete 50 successful bombing missions over Europe in World War II. He may be notable for that... I don't know much about that, but 50 sounds like a lot from what little I do know.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:36, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. IIRC, 50 bombing runs was the 'standard', so if you were on a bomber crew bombing Europe you either did the number of runs or got killed/invalided out. David V Houston (talk) 00:57, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.