- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Deathphoenix ʕ 04:29, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A non-sourced, POV article about an nn person. Has had a template askign for sources for nearly a year with no further edits. The person in question only gets 379 Google hits. Páll (Die pienk olifant) 05:14, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nn-bio, since it cannot be verified, deleting is the last resort. --Terence Ong 13:31, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see evidence of notability.--Ed (Edgar181) 14:01, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]- I'm going to abstain for now, based on RelHistBuff's comment below. --Ed (Edgar181) 14:51, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I don't get the idea that a brilliant google search result is equivalent to being notable. One can get bad results by using the wrong search terms. Try searching on Herman Hoeh without the middle initial and you get 23200 results! Then follow the links. He is definitely notable. I agree though that the article needs sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RelHistBuff (talk • contribs)
- Delete. The first link times out or is broken. Can't find any other reference to support WP:BIO notability. Crum375 19:08, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or merge with World wide church of god--Nick Y. 01:06, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nom. ILovePlankton ( L) 16:32, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.