Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hesh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. W.marsh 01:32, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a real phenomenon? I've never heard of it, it might be very notable, but I'm skeptical of it. Google turns up a ton of unrelated stuff. Delete without some outside evidence of notability. Grandmasterka 01:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep. I've never heard this word for it, but I think the fashion trend is real. Googling "hesh skateboarders" turns up some relevant stuff. Keep unless someone knows a more common word for this fashion, in which case redirect to that. --Allen 02:07, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• <sarcasm>Delete. Delete punk culture as well. </sarcasm> Keep, but expand. Royboycrashfan 02:18, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Skating jargon. Googling "hesh skating" and "hesh skaters" turns up multiple alternate meanings and many of them are simply someone's name. Certainly much less notable than other skating fashion trends and jargon. Metta Bubble 04:58, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep per Allen and it sounds rather likely anyway --Grocer 05:09, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and cleanup real term/fashion trend, article needs work joshbuddy^talk 06:33, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1. Weak keep --Terence Ong 11:03, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep & cleanup but that's a serious cleanup folks. There should be no hurry to put skating trends or neologisms into WP. It's becoming a bit of a generic skater term, in addition to uses already outlined, a "hesh sesh" is an impromptu skating session where nobody is worried about techical perfection. I'm guessing it gets used in other skater terms too. Deizio 12:17, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Needs cleanup -- Alpha269 14:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and cleanup. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 14:52, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per well argued nomination. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 21:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No sources. We're not here to provide original coverage of emerging slang or culture. Ned Wilbury 14:59, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.