The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:14, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hex Hectic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable music guy. Usual name dropping and PR sources. Not a single indepth independant source. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 16:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
MaghrebiFalafel, before you start judging other editors and Wikipedia at large, why don't you familiarize yourself with the guidelines first? You've been here less than a month and you got a total of 41 edits to your name. This is not helping your case. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 08:03, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • I spent countless hours reading the guidelines and hitting the preview button who knows how many times. The coding was hard to master and I spent hours looking at different examples of hip hop artists trying to make this work. Please don't make assumptions. MaghrebiFalafel (talk) 06:04, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Right, because "You clearly know nothing about hip hop" is not an assumption? If you did read the guidelines, maybe go over them again, because you are very WP:UNCIVIL towards others, in other deletion discussions as well. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 08:18, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
WP:RS by itself isn't the standard for notability; it's WP:SIGCOV: The reliable sources have to provide significant (not just passing mentions, short pieces, or routine schedule) coverage that is independent of the subject (not subject-controlled stories). --Closeapple (talk) 17:59, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.