Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High-tech lynching
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Clarence Thomas. Wizardman 03:41, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- High-tech lynching (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
unsourced dicdef Will (talk) 02:11, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Clarence Thomas, as it is
herhis quote. BJTalk 02:20, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Clarence Thomas is a girl? You learn something new every day on wikipedia. Nick mallory (talk) 05:18, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Whoops, wrong judge. *looks around nervously* BJTalk 22:24, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Clarence Thomas is a girl? You learn something new every day on wikipedia. Nick mallory (talk) 05:18, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per Bjweeks. In other news, I didn't know supreme court judges got sex changes... Master of Puppets Care to share? 05:52, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per BJ. No indication of any use other than by Clarence Thomas. --Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 14:11, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per everyone and per such precedents as Cablinasian --> Tiger Woods, for a neologism used only by that person.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 02:09, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as above, neologism. Even if coined by a famous person, it obviously hasn't caught on. Lankiveil (talk) 12:22, 26 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.