- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep both. --Angr (t·c) 18:43, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A group involved in preschooling in the US. The author claims notability, but I just don't see why it warrants a Wikipedia entry. see this as quasi-spam and self-promotion. The article on David P. Weikart, the group's founder, is even less notable, and if the group's article is kept anything on him should be merged and redirected there. Otherwise, delete him too. Harro5 05:59, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A quick Google search, and looking individually at various sites, indicates this is easily a notable topic. The bio qualifies both for what he's written (and had published), and about what's written about him by others. Both articles need substantial clean-up (de-promotionalize), but there's ample sources available to make a good article. --Rob 15:31, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep and merge merge the bio into the group page as another section J\/\/estbrook 15:50, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep on both. Stifle 01:53, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.