This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. The votes are: 2 to delete (including the nominator), 2 to keep, 1 to "keep or merge". Some form of merge may be in order. -- BD2412 talk 01:10, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
NN. This all fantasy stuff - there is no High Guard in the real world!A curate's egg 6 July 2005 15:34 (UTC)
- Keep — material on established television Sci-fi series. Plenty of precedents for this type of material exist in wikipedia. — RJH 6 July 2005 15:44 (UTC)
- weak keep or merge but rename it into 'High Guard (fictional) , or whatever. --Isolani 6 July 2005 15:55 (UTC)
- Keep. Articles on fictional subjects are fine as long as they say what they're from. Do not rename, since [[there's no need for disambiguation. — Gwalla | Talk 6 July 2005 18:20 (UTC)
- Not quite unique... there was a High Guard in Heinlein, I think. [pokes] ...in Between Planets (There's a page for every one of his novels - I'm impressed). I suspect it may be a reasonably common name for fictional military forces of one stripe or another, though the only one I could find on a cursory search was this. (No vote) - also, an early iteration? of the RPG Traveller. Shimgray 6 July 2005 23:39 (UTC)
- Delete; although I recently voted to keep a similar Star Trek article, that was because it was Star Trek. Andromeda minutiae don't rise to the same level. Dcarrano July 6, 2005 19:40 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.