Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High frequency computing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 00:35, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

High frequency computing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable neologism, no sources given or easily available, main author agrees with deletion, see Talk:High frequency computing for details. Tavix (talk) 01:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. This was written when I was unfamiliar with WP:N and do not object. Um, why wasn't this WP:PRODed? Ronnotel (talk) 02:07, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was, but Tavix apparently decided to give it a chance at AfD. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 07:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. It's possible there is another term for this concept, but "high-frequency" is more often used with hardware than software.[1] --Dhartung | Talk 07:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I originally WP:PRODed it after failing to find any apropos use of the term on Google or Google Scholar. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 07:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: a combination of a common adjective with a gerund. Many things are "high frequency" and "computing," but as a single combined form, it does not denote anything with substantial usage: neologism. Utgard Loki (talk) 18:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.