- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:36, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- High shield (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable residence. I think that this is it [1]. Some sort of vacation cottage?? :) Buddy23Lee (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No assertion of why this holiday cottage is more notable than the hundreds of others in Northumberland alone. If the article had included either of the external links presented here then I'd have had no hesitation in calling it an advert. As it is I'm wondering if it's just a failed attempt at an advert? Thryduulf (talk) 11:54, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 11:54, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. May or may not be an attempt at an advert, but all that "evidence shows a dwelling has existed there since the late 1700's" tells us is that a different building might have existed on the site one. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 17:50, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Worse than I thought. The link by Thryduulf shows that this "is a spacious single storey building providing self-catering holiday accommodation for two people". Make your reservations now, mate. Mandsford (talk) 17:59, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I think this was an attempt at an advert as I found this about the same page but with different caps: 15:54, 6 November 2009 CactusWriter (talk | contribs) deleted "High Shield" (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.highshield.co.uk/) Buddy23Lee (talk) 20:33, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 02:16, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.