Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highest-understanding theory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 14:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Highest-understanding theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable theory/original research (although it appears to be based on Myers-Briggs Type Indicator). --Snigbrook ^(talk) 13:52, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Quite certain that this is original research and a quick google would suggest that it non-notable as well. nancy ^(talk) 15:38, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable. Mkeranat (talk) 12:56, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Non-encyclopedic WP:OR. Wikipedia is not a peer review. --Evb-wiki (talk) 14:24, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:OR. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 12:54, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.