- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 15:40, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hiptoid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable neologism Ryan Vesey contribs 14:23, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:30, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non-notable neologism probably mistakenly used by the professor. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:31, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Clearly fails WP:NEO. Qrsdogg (talk) 16:14, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Deletoid is a term originally coined by Tim Davenport of Corvallis, Oregon in 2011 referring to a stub article for a non-notable neologism at Wikipedia. Davenport spends too much time screwing around at Articles for Deletion instead of getting busy and writing some serious content on the Communist League of America like he should be doing. Carrite (talk) 05:22, 21 July 2011 (UTC) Last edit: Carrite (talk) 07:04, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A neologism without any reliable sources, independent sourcing, or evidence of notability. Richwales (talk · contribs) 05:21, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.